<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 204 &#8211; Weapons of Ass Destruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dyscultured.com/2012/09/26/episode-204/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dyscultured.com/2012/09/26/episode-204/</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s irreverent news, tech and pop culture podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark ST</title>
		<link>http://www.dyscultured.com/2012/09/26/episode-204/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dyscultured.com/?p=3779#comment-2075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue of e-waste came up a lot this time. Please discuss the following interview with Mark Pilgrim (who I think still works at Google) next time:
http://mark.pilgrim.usesthis.com/
--------------------
I&#039;ve had my current desktop for a little over two years. I want to continue using it for another 20. I mean that literally: this computer, this keyboard, this mouse, these three monitors. 20 years. There&#039;s no technical reason the hardware can&#039;t last that long, so it&#039;s a matter of whether there will be useful software to run on it. First, there&#039;s the operating system. People throw away computers every day because they&#039;re &quot;too slow&quot; to run the latest version of their preferred operating system. Linux (and open source in general) is not immune to this, but I think it&#039;s more immune than proprietary operating systems. Debian only recently dropped official support for Motorola 68K machines; that&#039;s stuff like the Mac IIci that I bought off the clearance rack at Microcenter in 1992. The latest version of Debian still runs on my old PowerPC &quot;G4&quot; Apple laptop, even though the latest version of Apple&#039;s operating system doesn&#039;t. Commercial vendors have a vested interest in upgrading you to the latest and greatest; supporting the old stuff is unglamorous and expensive. Commercial open source vendors aren&#039;t really much better than commercial proprietary vendors in this regard, but community-led Linux distributions can afford to have different priorities.
--------------------
BTW I love your show!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue of e-waste came up a lot this time. Please discuss the following interview with Mark Pilgrim (who I think still works at Google) next time:<br />
<a href="http://mark.pilgrim.usesthis.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mark.pilgrim.usesthis.com/</a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
I&#8217;ve had my current desktop for a little over two years. I want to continue using it for another 20. I mean that literally: this computer, this keyboard, this mouse, these three monitors. 20 years. There&#8217;s no technical reason the hardware can&#8217;t last that long, so it&#8217;s a matter of whether there will be useful software to run on it. First, there&#8217;s the operating system. People throw away computers every day because they&#8217;re &#8220;too slow&#8221; to run the latest version of their preferred operating system. Linux (and open source in general) is not immune to this, but I think it&#8217;s more immune than proprietary operating systems. Debian only recently dropped official support for Motorola 68K machines; that&#8217;s stuff like the Mac IIci that I bought off the clearance rack at Microcenter in 1992. The latest version of Debian still runs on my old PowerPC &#8220;G4&#8243; Apple laptop, even though the latest version of Apple&#8217;s operating system doesn&#8217;t. Commercial vendors have a vested interest in upgrading you to the latest and greatest; supporting the old stuff is unglamorous and expensive. Commercial open source vendors aren&#8217;t really much better than commercial proprietary vendors in this regard, but community-led Linux distributions can afford to have different priorities.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
BTW I love your show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
